|Meritocracy: it's be great if it were|
how society actually worked
BTSF in chronological order (most recent articles appear first):
- ► 2016 (85)
- ► 2015 (95)
- ► 2014 (107)
- ► 2013 (109)
- Friday Fruit (08/31/12)
- Implicit Associations of Racism
- Friday Fruit (08/24/12)
- First Class Flight: Contradictions in Faith
- Friday Fruit (08/17/12)
- Whose Bad Economy?
- The Art of Worship
- Friday Fruit: Olympic Edition--Week 2 (08/10/12)
- Saved from Meritocracy (Part 2)
- Saved from Meritocracy (Part 1)
- Friday Fruit: Olympic Edition! (08/03/12)
- ▼ August (11)
- ► 2011 (112)
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Saved from Meritocracy (Part 2)
Now that we've discussed how 'meritocracy' is counter to the Christian concept of grace (see Part 1), let's see how that system holds up in practice in today's world:
Not only is meritocracy a false idol that divides us from the One who is truly responsible for our successes, but it's not even a reality-based system in the secular world. Anyone whose parents went to college or owned their own home received a head-start. Anyone who lives in stability or maintains consistent access to healthcare has an advantage in their daily pursuits.
Anyone that networks for a job, or can bring solid letters of recommendation to their interview has benefited from the goodwill of others. Anyone whose culture has been consistently represented in the seats of power has benefited from a tailored system of rules. No one gets where they are on merit alone (see post: Academic Admissions).
Yet even while we accept help from others, we despise and disparage those that need help from us: people that struggle every day to make it through. Like the Pharisees we proclaim “God, I thank you that I am not like other men–robbers, evildoers, adulterers” (Luke 18:11). Walter Russell Mead asserts that God "made you smart so that you could serve — and the people he wants you to serve are exactly all those people you feel so arrogantly superior to." Will we be like the servant who receive mercy and grace, but will not offer it to others?
When we achieve success, might it be because our hard work went toward getting us ahead, rather just than surviving? If it takes every effort for someone to keep from falling behind, how do we expect that they will move forward? If we are secure in our basic survival, our skills and talents can propel us to great heights. But if adversity creates struggle for basic need, how can one's gifts ever reach their full potential? And then we all miss out in witnessing the splendor of God's blessings that might have been realized.
We bristle at giving aid to people that 'don't deserve our help.' But what have we ever deserved? And what if someone happens to be 'undeserving'? So what? Is this not the very definition of grace?
There are indeed those elite few that have achieved great things in the face of adversity--bone fide 'rags-to-riches' achievement. But we love their stories precisely because they are so rare. The reality is that for millions of people, overcoming systemic disadvantage is exhausting to the point of hopelessness and even resignation.
We know that we aught to work hard because it brings glory to god, not because we'll get stuff. God didn't give you a good education, stable family, safe neighborhood so that you could boast in your own greatness. He didn't make you rich so you could buy a nice car. Every blessing we have is a gift, and it comes with responsibility: "From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded" (Luke 12:48). Or do we believe it is better to store up our treasures on earth?